Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
m |
m |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[ Conceptual modeling | Development of a conceptual model for a field site (Akacievej, Hedehusene) ]] | [[ Conceptual modeling | Development of a conceptual model for a field site (Akacievej, Hedehusene) ]] | ||
| − | [[ Model concepts | Available model | + | [[ Modeling objectives | Modeling objectives: how can models help in decision making? ]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[ Model concepts | Available model types for flow and transport in fractured aquifers ]] | ||
[[ Modeling tools | Modeling tools and little helpers]] | [[ Modeling tools | Modeling tools and little helpers]] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[ Model setup | Model setup for fracture flow and transport in limestone aquifers ]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[ Field data and model calibration ]] | ||
| − | [[ Model | + | [[ Model output | Model output: what do we get out of the different models? ]] |
[[ Recommendations ]] | [[ Recommendations ]] | ||
Revision as of 15:29, 20 April 2016
Modeling guideline for contaminant transport in fractured limestone aquifers and development of a conceptual model for a field site (Akacievej, Hedehusene)
Authors: Klaus Mosthaf, Mette Martina Broholm, Poul Løgstrup Bjerg, Philip John Binning (DTU Environment)
Overview
Physical processes and properties of limestone
Data acquisition and field methods
Development of a conceptual model for a field site (Akacievej, Hedehusene)
Modeling objectives: how can models help in decision making?
Available model types for flow and transport in fractured aquifers
Modeling tools and little helpers
Model setup for fracture flow and transport in limestone aquifers
Field data and model calibration
Model output: what do we get out of the different models?
