Example: Akacievej

Example: Setup and application of models for a field site (Akacievej, Hedehusene)

Several models were compared for the Akacievej site, where a plume of dissolved PCE had spread in a fractured limestone aquifer and where a remediation system was in the process of re-evaluation. Numerical modeling was integrated in the planning of field tests and in the update of the conceptual model of the contaminated site, starting with a simple model and adding complexity, when new field data was available.

The field data included information on spill history, distribution of the contaminant (multilevel sampling), geology and hydrogeology. To describe the geology and fracture system, data from borehole logs, packer tests, optical televiewers and cores was combined with an analysis of local heterogeneities and data from analogue sites. A pumping and tracer test with depth-specific contaminant sampling was conducted at the site to determine flow and transport parameters of the fractures and matrix and to quantify the contaminant distribution in the aquifer. Different models were used for the planning and interpretation of the pumping and tracer test. This is described in the following report:

• Report about the pumping and tracer tests at Akacievej, Hedehusene (PDF)

To reduce the numerical effort and to simulate the plume propagation on a larger scale, a coupled 2D plume-scale and 3D source-zone model was developed. The 3D model resolves flow and transport in the source zone. Therefore, an initial contaminant distribution in the source zone was implemented, which is based on depth-specific measurements of PCE. The source-zone model is then used to compute the contaminant input fluxes for the 2D model, which starts at the downstream end of the source zone model.

The following report (in Danish) shows the setup and application of this coupled 3D source-zone and 2D plume-scale model, which supported the re-evaluation of the remediation system at the Akacievej site:

• Akacievej - Data- and modeling basis for the re-evaluation of the remediation system

Since a great part of the PCE contamination is located in the crushed limestone (upper 3-5 m), it was included in the model setup. The crushed limestone has different hydraulic properties as the fractured limestone. The bulk hydraulic conductivity was slightly lower than in the fractured limestone. No distinct horizontal fractures as in the fractured limestone could be identified. Most likely, the fractured limestone contains many more small fractures, small cavities and some larger intact limestone chunks. Then, most of the advective transport happens in the conductive areas with a diffusive exchange with lower conductive areas. This could be described by a dual-porosity model. However, there was only limited knowledge of the hydraulic properties in the high- and low-conductive areas and the exchange between them. Instead, a homogeneous unit with a unifrom conductivity was used. To still account for the immobile areas with storage of contaminant, the sorption coefficient was modified.

Return to Content