Difference between revisions of "Geology and properties of limestone"

From Limestone
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Properties of limestone)
m (Properties of the limestone at Akacievej (Hedehusene, Denmark))
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|}
 
|}
  
[[File:GeologicSequenceGEUS2014.png|thumb|25em|Fig. 1: Geologic sequence in eastern Denmark. From: GEO and GEUS (2014), Strømning og stoftransport i kalklagene på den københavnske vestegn.]]
+
[[File:GeologicSequenceGEUS2014.png|thumb|25em|Fig. 1: Geologic sequence in eastern Denmark. From: Galsgaard et al. (2014)<ref name="GeoGeus2014" />.]]
[[File:BoreholeCores.png|thumb|25em|Fig. 2: Borehole cores from the Akacievej field site.]]
+
[[File:BoreholeCores.png|thumb|25em|Fig. 2: Borehole cores from the Akacievej field site with flint inclusions and fractures. Note that some of the fractures and crushing that can be seen in Figure 2 are caused by the drilling.]]
<!-- [[File:Geology_Akacievej_GEO_extended.png|thumb|500px| Fig.3: Geology at the Akacievej site.]] -->
 
  
 
{| class="body1"
 
{| class="body1"
 
|
 
|
<!--
 
[[File:GeologicSequenceGEUS2014.png|thumb|25em|Fig. 1: Geologic sequence in eastern Denmark. From: GEO and GEUS (2014).]]
 
[[File:BoreholeCores.png|thumb|25em|Fig. 2: Borehole cores from the Akacievej field site.]]
 
-->
 
 
== Geology and hydrogeology ==
 
== Geology and hydrogeology ==
In eastern Denmark, glacial Quaternary deposits (clay till, sand) are usually on top of the limestone aquifers.
+
In eastern Denmark, glacial Quaternary deposits (clayey till, sand) are usually on top of limestone aquifers.
The uppermost limestone layer is typically a carbonated sand limestone (also called Københavns Kalk), followed by a bryozoan limestone.
+
The uppermost limestone layer is typically a calcarenitic limestone (also called Københavns Kalk), followed by bryozoan limestone.
The carbonated sand limestone is rather evenly and horizontally layered and may contain flint layers and nodules.
+
The calcarenitic  limestone is rather evenly and horizontally layered and may contain flint layers and nodules.
The bryozoan limestone, in contrast, has typically bank structures and few to no flint inclusions.
+
The bryozoan limestone typically shows bank structures and few to no flint inclusions.
A good description of the geologic stratification in the greater Copenhagen area is given in the Report by GEO and GEUS <ref name="GeoGeus2014"> GEO & GEUS (2014), ''Strømning og stoftransport i kalklagene på den københavnske vestegn. Geologisk og hydrologisk vidensopsamling og typemodel.''</ref> (in Danish).
+
A good description of the geologic stratification in the greater Copenhagen area is given in the Report by GEO and GEUS <ref name="GeoGeus2014"> Galsgaard et al. (2014), ''[[:Media:Stroemning_og_stoftransport_i_kalklagene_pa_den_koebenhavnske_vestegn.pdf| Strømning og stoftransport i kalklagene på den københavnske vestegn]]'' (in Danish).</ref>.
 
Figure 1 shows the typical krono-, bio- and lithostratigraphy in eastern Zealand (Denmark) and in the Øresundsregion.
 
Figure 1 shows the typical krono-, bio- and lithostratigraphy in eastern Zealand (Denmark) and in the Øresundsregion.
  
Limestone geologies are often heavily fractured and can include almost impermeable chert layers and nodules.
+
Limestone geologies are often heavily fractured and especially the calcarenitic limestone includes almost impermeable chert layers and nodules.
The chert can appear as layers that stretch over a distance of tens to hundreds of meters or as loose inclusions embedded in the limestone.
+
The chert layers can stretch over distances of tens to hundreds of meters or they can occur as loose inclusions embedded in the limestone.
Figure 2 shows some borehole cores from the Akacievej site, which illustrate the heterogeneity of the limestone with flint layers, crushed material and fractures.
+
Figure 2 shows some borehole cores from the Akacievej site, which illustrate the heterogeneity of the limestone with chert, crushed material and fractures.
Note that some of the fractures and crushing that can be seen in Figure 2 is caused by the drilling.
+
The upper part of the limestone aquifer may be crushed due to glacial activity.
 +
At the Akacievej site, a crushed layer with a thickness of 3-5 m was observed.
 +
It has different hydraulic properties than the fractured limestone, f.e. the bulk hydraulic conductivity was lower than in the fractured limestone below.
  
In fractured limestone geologies, flow predominantly occurs in the fractures, because they provide a much higher hydraulic conductivity than the limestone matrix.
+
Limestone aquifers are often very heterogeneous and the hydraulic parameters can span over wide ranges and have a strong spatial variation.
Two different kinds of fractures can be distinguished: horizontal fractures often caused by decompression, and vertical/subvertical fractures, typically caused by tectonic activities.
+
As with many other geologic materials, limestone aquifers are typically anisotropic, which means that their horizontal hydraulic conductivity is about 2 to 10 times as high as in the vertical direction.
Especially the vertical and subvertical fractures can influence the anisotropic behavior of limestone aquifers, because the dominating flow is guided through the fractures.
+
Major horizontal fractures can intensify the observed degree of anisotropy.
Due to that it is possible, that the main flow direction differs from the overall hydraulic head gradient, and the direction of the major fractures has to be considered.
+
The intact limestone matrix has a very low hydraulic conductivity.
 +
When fractures are present, their conductivity is often orders of magnitude higher than the matrix and flow occurs predominantly in the fractures.
 +
 
 +
Different kinds of fractures can be distinguished: horizontal fractures, which are often caused by decompression (related to glacial activity), and vertical/subvertical fractures, typically caused by tectonic activities.
 +
Fractures can influence the anisotropic behavior of limestone aquifers, because the groundwater flow is guided through the fractures.
 +
Due to that, it is possible that the main flow direction differs from the overall hydraulic head gradient, and the direction of the major fractures has to be considered.
 
The orientation of the vertical fractures is, as a rule of thumb, often aligned with major faults in the area <ref name="GeoGeus2014" />.
 
The orientation of the vertical fractures is, as a rule of thumb, often aligned with major faults in the area <ref name="GeoGeus2014" />.
 +
Limestone has a relatively high matrix porosity (between 7 and 46 Vol.-% were observed at the Akacievej site <ref name="Broholm2016"> Broholm et al. (2016a), ''[[:Media:Sammenligning_af_niveauspecifikke_prøvetagningsmetoder.pdf|Sammenligning af niveauspecifikke prøvetagningsmetoder for vurdering af koncentrationsfordeling i kalkmagasin]]'' (in Danish). Technical University of Denmark, DTU Environment</ref>). The porosity of the fracture system (volume fraction of the fractures), where groundwater flow and advective transport often mainly take place, is comparably low (0.5 to 2 Vol.-%).
  
The local geology at the Akacievej site is described [[The Akacievej field site|here]].
+
== Properties of the limestone at Akacievej (Hedehusene, Denmark)==
<!--
+
The local geology at the Akacievej site in Hedehusene (eastern Denmark) is described [[The Akacievej field site|here]].
[[File:Geology_Akacievej_GEO_extended.png|thumb|500px| Fig.3: Geology at the Akacievej site.]]
 
 
 
The geology at the Akacievej site is depicted in Figure 3 and consists of a carbonated sand limestone (København Kalk) on top of a bryozoan limestone (Stevns Klint formation), both with a strongly varying hardness.
 
Due to glacial activity, the uppermost 1 to 5 meters of the limestone are crushed.
 
Most of the crushed limestone is in the carbonated sand limestone, but at some places it also penetrates into the bryozoan limestone.
 
The bryozoan limestone at Akacievej does not show strong bank structures and is rather even.
 
<br clear=all> -->
 
 
 
== Properties of limestone ==
 
Limestone aquifers are often very heterogeneous and the hydraulic parameters can span over wide ranges.
 
Moreover, they can have a strong spatial variation, both, vertically and horizontally.
 
The limestone matrix has typically a very low hydraulic conductivity, which can be several orders of magnitude lower than the conductivity in the fractures.
 
Limestone has a relatively high porosity (8-40 Vol.-%), the porosity of the fractures is comparably low (0.5-2 Vol.-%).
 
Limestone aquifers are typically anisotropic, which means that their horizontal hydraulic conductivity is about 2 to 10 times as high as in the vertical direction.
 
 
 
 
Based on a set of different measurements and modeling interpretations, hydraulic parameters and transport parameters were determined for the Akacievej site.
 
Based on a set of different measurements and modeling interpretations, hydraulic parameters and transport parameters were determined for the Akacievej site.
 
The employed field methods are described in the Chapters [[ Data acquisition | '''Data acquisition and field methods''' ]] and [[ Transport parameters and contaminant data | '''Determination of transport parameters and contaminant data''']].
 
The employed field methods are described in the Chapters [[ Data acquisition | '''Data acquisition and field methods''' ]] and [[ Transport parameters and contaminant data | '''Determination of transport parameters and contaminant data''']].
Line 58: Line 46:
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Tab. 1: Overview of parameters determined at the Akacievej site.
+
|+ Tab. 1: Overview of parameters determined at the Akacievej site or for comparable limestone sites.
 +
|-
 +
! Parameter !! Value !! Comment !! Determination method
 
|-
 
|-
! Parameter !! Value !! Comment
+
| <math> K_\text{crushed} </math> || <math> 5\cdot 10^{-4}\ \text{m/s} </math>|| crushed limestone (bulk) conductivity || slug tests, data from remedial well
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> K_{crushed} </math> || <math> 5\cdot 10^{-4} \text{m/s} </math>|| crushed limestone conductivity
+
| <math> K_\text{matrix} </math> || <math> 10^{-6} - 5\cdot 10^{-11}\ \text{m/s} </math> || matrix conductivity || permeameter tests on subcores, pumping test
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> K_{matrix} </math> || <math> 10^{-7}\ \text{m/s} </math> || limestone conductivity
+
| <math> K_\text{fractures} </math> || <math> 0.6 - 5.4\ \text{m/s} </math> || fracture conductivity || determined from hydraulic fracture aperture with the cubic law
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> n_{matrix} </math> || <math> 0.10 - 0.20 </math> || matrix porosity
+
| <math> Ap </math> || <math> 1 - 3\ \text{mm} </math> || typical hydraulic aperture of major horizontal fracture || pumping test, packer test
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> Ap </math> || <math> 2\ \text{mm} </math> || typical fracture aperture
+
| <math> n_\text{matrix} </math> || <math> 0.07 - 0.46 </math> || matrix porosity || porosimeter tests on subcores, pumping test
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> B </math> || <math> 20 - 25\ \text{m} </math> || aquifer thickness
+
| <math> B </math> || <math> 20 - 25\ \text{m} </math> || aquifer thickness || flow logs
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> D_m </math> || <math> 7.5\cdot 10^{-7} \text{m}^2/\text{s} </math> || effective diffusivity
+
| <math> D_\text{m} </math> || <math> 7.5\cdot 10^{-7} \text{m}^2/\text{s} </math> || (augmented) effective diffusivity of bromide || modeling of tracer test, includes effect of neglected fractures and stagnant flow zones
 
|-
 
|-
| <math> k_d </math> || <math> 0.5-1.0\ \text{L/kg} </math> || sorption coefficient for PCE on limestone
+
| <math> k_\text{d} </math> || <math> 0.5-1.0\ \text{L/kg} </math> || sorption coefficient for PCE on limestone || sorption tests in lab <ref name="Salzer2013" />
 
|}
 
|}
  
The sorption behavior for chlorinated solvents on limestone was examined in Salzer (2013) <ref> Salzer, J.P. (2013), ''Sorption capacity and governing parameters for transport of chlorinated solvents in chalk aquifers'', Master Thesis, DTU. </ref>.
+
The sorption behavior for chlorinated solvents on limestone was examined in Salzer (2013) <ref name="Salzer2013"> Salzer, J.P. (2013), ''Sorption capacity and governing parameters for transport of chlorinated solvents in chalk aquifers'', Master Thesis, DTU. </ref>.
For chlorinated solvents like PCE, sorption to limestone can be strong (kd values of 0.5-1 L/kg were measured).
+
For chlorinated solvents like PCE, sorption to limestone can be strong ($k_d$ values of $0.5-1 \ \text{L/kg}$ were measured in lab tests).
  
 
{{Return}}
 
{{Return}}
 
|}
 
|}
 
[[Category:Introduction]] [[Category:Geology]]
 
[[Category:Introduction]] [[Category:Geology]]

Latest revision as of 13:09, 3 July 2019

Highlights
  • Description of limestone geology
  • Properties of limestone aquifers
Fig. 1: Geologic sequence in eastern Denmark. From: Galsgaard et al. (2014)[1].
Fig. 2: Borehole cores from the Akacievej field site with flint inclusions and fractures. Note that some of the fractures and crushing that can be seen in Figure 2 are caused by the drilling.

Geology and hydrogeology

In eastern Denmark, glacial Quaternary deposits (clayey till, sand) are usually on top of limestone aquifers. The uppermost limestone layer is typically a calcarenitic limestone (also called Københavns Kalk), followed by bryozoan limestone. The calcarenitic limestone is rather evenly and horizontally layered and may contain flint layers and nodules. The bryozoan limestone typically shows bank structures and few to no flint inclusions. A good description of the geologic stratification in the greater Copenhagen area is given in the Report by GEO and GEUS [1]. Figure 1 shows the typical krono-, bio- and lithostratigraphy in eastern Zealand (Denmark) and in the Øresundsregion.

Limestone geologies are often heavily fractured and especially the calcarenitic limestone includes almost impermeable chert layers and nodules. The chert layers can stretch over distances of tens to hundreds of meters or they can occur as loose inclusions embedded in the limestone. Figure 2 shows some borehole cores from the Akacievej site, which illustrate the heterogeneity of the limestone with chert, crushed material and fractures. The upper part of the limestone aquifer may be crushed due to glacial activity. At the Akacievej site, a crushed layer with a thickness of 3-5 m was observed. It has different hydraulic properties than the fractured limestone, f.e. the bulk hydraulic conductivity was lower than in the fractured limestone below.

Limestone aquifers are often very heterogeneous and the hydraulic parameters can span over wide ranges and have a strong spatial variation. As with many other geologic materials, limestone aquifers are typically anisotropic, which means that their horizontal hydraulic conductivity is about 2 to 10 times as high as in the vertical direction. Major horizontal fractures can intensify the observed degree of anisotropy. The intact limestone matrix has a very low hydraulic conductivity. When fractures are present, their conductivity is often orders of magnitude higher than the matrix and flow occurs predominantly in the fractures.

Different kinds of fractures can be distinguished: horizontal fractures, which are often caused by decompression (related to glacial activity), and vertical/subvertical fractures, typically caused by tectonic activities. Fractures can influence the anisotropic behavior of limestone aquifers, because the groundwater flow is guided through the fractures. Due to that, it is possible that the main flow direction differs from the overall hydraulic head gradient, and the direction of the major fractures has to be considered. The orientation of the vertical fractures is, as a rule of thumb, often aligned with major faults in the area [1]. Limestone has a relatively high matrix porosity (between 7 and 46 Vol.-% were observed at the Akacievej site [2]). The porosity of the fracture system (volume fraction of the fractures), where groundwater flow and advective transport often mainly take place, is comparably low (0.5 to 2 Vol.-%).

Properties of the limestone at Akacievej (Hedehusene, Denmark)

The local geology at the Akacievej site in Hedehusene (eastern Denmark) is described here. Based on a set of different measurements and modeling interpretations, hydraulic parameters and transport parameters were determined for the Akacievej site. The employed field methods are described in the Chapters Data acquisition and field methods and Determination of transport parameters and contaminant data. Table 1 gives an overview of values that were determined at the Akacievej site.

Tab. 1: Overview of parameters determined at the Akacievej site or for comparable limestone sites.
Parameter Value Comment Determination method
[math] K_\text{crushed} [/math] [math] 5\cdot 10^{-4}\ \text{m/s} [/math] crushed limestone (bulk) conductivity slug tests, data from remedial well
[math] K_\text{matrix} [/math] [math] 10^{-6} - 5\cdot 10^{-11}\ \text{m/s} [/math] matrix conductivity permeameter tests on subcores, pumping test
[math] K_\text{fractures} [/math] [math] 0.6 - 5.4\ \text{m/s} [/math] fracture conductivity determined from hydraulic fracture aperture with the cubic law
[math] Ap [/math] [math] 1 - 3\ \text{mm} [/math] typical hydraulic aperture of major horizontal fracture pumping test, packer test
[math] n_\text{matrix} [/math] [math] 0.07 - 0.46 [/math] matrix porosity porosimeter tests on subcores, pumping test
[math] B [/math] [math] 20 - 25\ \text{m} [/math] aquifer thickness flow logs
[math] D_\text{m} [/math] [math] 7.5\cdot 10^{-7} \text{m}^2/\text{s} [/math] (augmented) effective diffusivity of bromide modeling of tracer test, includes effect of neglected fractures and stagnant flow zones
[math] k_\text{d} [/math] [math] 0.5-1.0\ \text{L/kg} [/math] sorption coefficient for PCE on limestone sorption tests in lab [3]

The sorption behavior for chlorinated solvents on limestone was examined in Salzer (2013) [3]. For chlorinated solvents like PCE, sorption to limestone can be strong ($k_d$ values of $0.5-1 \ \text{L/kg}$ were measured in lab tests).


Return to Content

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Galsgaard et al. (2014), Strømning og stoftransport i kalklagene på den københavnske vestegn (in Danish).
  2. Broholm et al. (2016a), Sammenligning af niveauspecifikke prøvetagningsmetoder for vurdering af koncentrationsfordeling i kalkmagasin (in Danish). Technical University of Denmark, DTU Environment
  3. 3.0 3.1 Salzer, J.P. (2013), Sorption capacity and governing parameters for transport of chlorinated solvents in chalk aquifers, Master Thesis, DTU.